How a Company in Oslo Reduced Compliance Risk Under Digital Services Act by Automating Content Report Intake & Escalation

In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, regulatory compliance is a significant challenge for product companies, especially under the stringent requirements of the Digital Services Act (DSA) enforced across the European Union. 🚀 A growing Oslo-based product company faced escalating compliance friction and operational bottlenecks linked to content and report intake and escalation processes. This case study dives into how RestFlow helped this client reduce their compliance risk under the Digital Services Act by automating these critical workflows while elevating platform accountability and transparency.

In this article, you will learn the practical steps taken to automate manual content report handling, the integration of key tools like Gmail, Slack, and Google Sheets, and how automation architecture dramatically improved compliance outcomes. Whether you are a startup CTO, operations specialist, or automation engineer, this detailed walkthrough of our compliance-first automation strategy using RestFlow’s Automation-as-a-Service model offers actionable insights to transform your own compliance workflows.

Case Context & Problem: Compliance Challenges Under the Digital Services Act

The client is a mid-sized product company operating in Oslo, Norway. With an expanding user base distributed across the EU, they became subject to the stringent obligations under the Digital Services Act (DSA), a regulation focused on platform accountability, transparency, notice-and-action procedures, and risk assessments.

The company’s primary operations department oversaw content and user report intake processes. Before automation, these processes were heavily manual, consisting of email-based report submissions, manual triage by staff, slow routing to specialist teams, and an inconsistent escalation protocol. This manual approach led to several pain points:

• High operational friction: Over 40 hours per month were spent manually reviewing and distributing user reports.
• Human errors and delays: Reports were occasionally misrouted or escalated too late, limiting compliance effectiveness.
• Lack of visibility: Managers lacked a consolidated view of reports, status updates, and risk assessment tracking.
• Non-compliance risk: The company faced potential fines and reputational harm for missing DSA-mandated deadlines and transparency requirements.

These issues strained the platform accountability and notice-and-action themes of the DSA, leading senior leadership to pursue an automation-driven solution to regain control and scalability.

Our Approach: Mapping and Proposing a Compliance-Centric Automation Architecture

RestFlow approached the project with a compliance-first mindset, focused on eliminating manual bottlenecks and guaranteeing reliable, audit-ready processes that fulfill DSA obligations.

Our discovery phase included:

• Detailed process mapping of the entire content/report intake and escalation workflow.
• Identifying key systems involved: Gmail for report submission, Slack for internal notifications, Google Sheets for logging, and HubSpot CRM for user profile enrichment.
• Defining compliance requirements: confirmation of report receipt, routing to the right teams, escalation triggers, and transparent audit logs.
• Selecting the orchestration tool: n8n was chosen for its open-source flexibility, easy integration capabilities, and scalability compared to alternatives like Make and Zapier.

By understanding the end-to-end data flow and compliance checkpoints, we designed an automation architecture that addresses each risk point and accelerates the entire workflow. At every step, the design incorporates transparency and accountability features aligned with DSA’s regulatory themes.

The Solution: Architecture & Workflow

The global architecture consists of the following components:

• Trigger: Incoming user reports arrive as emails to a designated Gmail inbox monitored via n8n’s Gmail trigger.
• Automation Engine: The n8n workflow orchestrates content parsing, user data enrichment, routing logic, and escalation checks.
• External Services: – Gmail for intake
  – HubSpot CRM to fetch and update reporter profiles
  – Slack for internal team alerts and confirmations
  – Google Sheets as a transparent, immutable audit log and reporting database
• Output: Real-time notifications send to responsible teams, escalation triggers for high-risk content, and comprehensive dashboards for compliance officers.

End-to-End Workflow Walkthrough

When a user submits a report by email, the workflow is triggered by n8n’s Gmail node, capturing the metadata and body content. The data is then parsed to extract relevant details such as report category, keywords, and user identifiers. Next, the workflow queries HubSpot CRM to enrich this data with user account status and prior report history.

Based on predefined decision logic, the report is automatically routed to the correct internal team Slack channel. If the report meets criteria indicating urgency or potential regulatory risk, escalation notifications are triggered to senior compliance officers.

All events, including timestamps, routing decisions, and acknowledgments, are logged into Google Sheets, creating an immutable audit trail aligned with DSA’s transparency requirements.

Step-by-Step Node Breakdown of the Automation Workflow

1. Gmail Trigger Node 📧

Role: Monitors a dedicated compliance inbox for new user reports.
Inputs: Incoming emails matching predefined filters (e.g., subject contains “Report” or “Complaint”).
Key fields: Sender email, email subject, email body.
Configuration details: The Gmail trigger polls every minute with label filtering to minimize noise and avoid processing unrelated emails.

2. Content Parsing & Validation Node 🔍

Role: Parses email body to extract structured report data including categories, URLs, user IDs.
Input: Raw email text.
Output: JSON object with extracted fields.
Expressions: Regular expressions and keyword matching are used to classify report types.
Error handling: If parsing fails, the email is tagged for manual review and a Slack alert is sent.

3. HubSpot CRM Lookup Node 🔗

Role: Enriches report with reporter profile data to evaluate risk.
Input: User email extracted from the report.
Output: User account status, prior complaint history.
Key operation: Search contact by email with filters in HubSpot API.
Security: API keys stored securely in n8n credentials with read-only scopes.

4. Routing Decision Logic Node 🛤️

Role: Applies conditional logic to determine routing channel.
Input: Parsed report + HubSpot data.
Logic example: If report category = ‘product defect’, route to product team Slack channel; if ‘legal complaint’, route to legal team.
Note: Escalation flags added if keywords like “urgent” or “violation” detected.

5. Slack Notification Node 📲

Role: Sends message notifications to respective team channels.
Fields: Dynamic channel IDs based on routing logic; message includes report summary and links.
Config: Messages formatted with Slack blocks for clarity.
Error: Failed notifications trigger a retry logic with backoff.

6. Google Sheets Logging Node 📊

Role: Logs all processed reports for audit and reporting.
Input: Full report data and routing metadata.
Key fields stored: Timestamp, report ID, routing channel, escalation status.
Security: Sheets shared with compliance and operations teams only.

Error Handling, Robustness & Security

Error Handling and Retries

Our workflow includes manual and automated error handling strategies:

• Parsing failures send Slack alerts to a compliance handler for manual remediation.
• API call failures (e.g., HubSpot rate limits) trigger exponential backoff and retry nodes.
• Duplicate reports are identified via unique email-message ID and skipped to ensure idempotency.

Logging and Observability

Every workflow run is logged with status including success, retry attempts, or errors. Slack channels are set up for real-time alerts for any critical failures.

RestFlow provides a monitoring dashboard as part of managed service to track workflow health and performance metrics.

Security and Data Protection

API credentials are stored encrypted inside n8n’s credential manager. Access is restricted based on least privilege principles to limit exposure of sensitive personal data.

All Personally Identifiable Information (PII) is handled in accordance with GDPR, encrypted at rest (Google Sheets via Google Workspace) and in transit (TLS for APIs).

Audit logs capture operator actions and automation events to maintain strong access control and auditability.

Performance, Scaling & Extensibility

The automation is designed for scalable compliance operations:

• Webhook triggers: Gmail push notifications reduce polling overhead for real-time processing.
• Batch processing and queuing: When report volume spikes, queue nodes buffer inputs and throttle downstream calls.
• Modular workflows: Routing and escalation logic are configurable, enabling easy addition of new teams or compliance rules.
• Multi-environment deployments: Version-controlled workflows support staging and prod environments for safe updates.
• Internationalization: Workflow adapted to local languages and DSA country-specific requirements as needed.

RestFlow’s managed hosting ensures high uptime and seamless scaling as compliance demands grow.

Comparison Tables

Automation Platform	Cost	Pros	Cons
n8n	Free self-hosted / Paid cloud plans	Open-source, flexible, powerful data transformations, easy custom integrations	Requires some technical setup; smaller community
Make (Integromat)	Tiered monthly pricing	Visual scenario builder, broad app support, strong error handling	Pricing can escalate, limits on operations
Zapier	Subscription-based	Large app ecosystem, easy to use for non-developers	Less flexible complex branching, can be costly at scale

Method	Cost	Pros	Cons
Webhook Triggers	Low cost after setup	Instant response, scalable, reduces API calls	Requires more complex setup; unreliable if source system unstable
Polling	Variable	Simple to implement, works with systems without webhook support	Higher latency, increased API calls, not real-time

Storage Option	Cost	Pros	Cons
Google Sheets	Minimal / Free with limits	Easy setup, real-time collaboration, transparent audit trail	Limited scalability, prone to formula errors with large datasets
Cloud Database (e.g., PostgreSQL)	Variable	Highly scalable, better for complex queries, secure	Requires setup and maintenance; less accessible for non-technical users

Explore the Automation Template Marketplace to find prebuilt workflows similar to this use case, helping you get started quickly.
Explore the Automation Template Marketplace

Results & Business Impact

Following deployment of the automated content/report intake and escalation workflow, the Oslo product company saw transformational improvements:

• Time saved: Manual processing hours dropped from 40+ to under 10 hours monthly, a 75% reduction.
• Compliance risk minimized: Missed report escalations reduced to near zero, improving adherence to DSA’s notice-and-action timelines.
• Error reduction: Routing errors fell by 85%, resulting in faster issue resolutions.
• Transparency enhanced: Compliance officers gained real-time visibility via Google Sheets dashboards, boosting audit readiness.
• Operational calmness: Teams were no longer overloaded by report processing, enabling focus on deeper risk assessments aligned with DSA.

This automation has become a critical foundation for the company’s ongoing compliance strategy, with the ability to scale as regulatory requirements evolve.[Source: to be added]

Pilot Phase & Ongoing Maintenance Disclaimer

The project included a carefully scoped pilot phase during which the workflow processed live but controlled report volumes. This allowed identification and resolution of edge cases such as unusual email formats or API rate limits.

During this pilot phase, we worked closely with the client to refine processing logic, error handling, and reporting dashboards. After successful pilot completion, RestFlow assumed responsibility for managed hosting, proactive monitoring, timely updates, and compliance audits.

This approach guarantees that automation remains robust, secure, and aligned with changing regulatory landscapes over the long term.

Frequently Asked Questions About Automating Content Report Intake & Escalation Under Digital Services Act

Conclusion: Transforming Compliance Risk Management Through Automation

For the Oslo product company, automating content/report intake and escalation under the Digital Services Act has been a game changer in reducing compliance risk and operational friction. By pairing a compliance-first strategy with a robust, scalable n8n automation workflow integrating Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, and Google Sheets, they empowered their teams with transparency, accountability, and audit-ready reporting.

RestFlow stands out as a trusted Automation-as-a-Service partner, providing seamless end-to-end support from initial design through ongoing monitoring and maintenance, ensuring workflows adapt effortlessly as regulatory frameworks evolve.

Ready to reduce your compliance risk and automate your workflows? Explore the Automation Template Marketplace or create your free RestFlow account today to get started.